Courts
Ninth Circuit Refuses to Apply California’s “Reasonable Particularity” Requirement to Claims Under the Defend Trade Secrets ActDelaware Courts Limit Noncompete Enforcement in Incentive PlansEvidence of a Defendant’s Physical or Digital Retention of Trade Secret Information Is Not Required to Prove Trade Secret Misappropriation Under the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act
Discovery
Signed, Sealed, Delivered? Fifth Circuit Finds Sealing of Sensitive Information Requires Far More Than a Protective OrderTrade Secret Litigants Take Note: California District Court Provides Guidance on Obtaining a Preliminary Injunction and Expedited DiscoveryTrade Secret Takeaways from the Ninth Circuit’s Decision in InteliClear, LLC v. ETC Global Holdings, Inc.
DTSA
The Proliferation of Trade Secret Misappropriation and U.S. Enforcement ChoicesReap What You Sow – Sixth Circuit Affirms Recovery of Research and Development Costs to Agricultural Company in Trade Secret CaseOne Bad Apple Won’t Spoil the Rest of the Bunch’s Ability to Fairly Compete in Matthews International Corp. v. Lombardi
FTC
FTC Signals Shift to Targeted Enforcement of Non-Competes in the Healthcare IndustryMaine Governor’s Veto of Non-Compete Ban Bucks Growing Trend Among States and Federal Trade CommissionNot So “Final”? Texas Federal Court Enjoins Enforcement of FTC’s Noncompete Ban, Leaving Future of Commission’s Rule in Doubt
Protection
Reap What You Sow – Sixth Circuit Affirms Recovery of Research and Development Costs to Agricultural Company in Trade Secret CaseOne Bad Apple Won’t Spoil the Rest of the Bunch’s Ability to Fairly Compete in Matthews International Corp. v. LombardiInsufficient Evidence: Fifth Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction for Trade Secret Misappropriation
Remedies
Reap What You Sow – Sixth Circuit Affirms Recovery of Research and Development Costs to Agricultural Company in Trade Secret CaseOne Bad Apple Won’t Spoil the Rest of the Bunch’s Ability to Fairly Compete in Matthews International Corp. v. LombardiThe Developing “Avoided Costs” Remedy in Trade Secret Litigation
Sanctions
A High Mountain to Climb: Filing DTSA Claims Without any Evidence is Not Enough to Meet “Bad Faith” Standard for Awarding Attorneys’ Fees to OpponentIllinois Appellate Court Upholds Sanctions Against Radio Advertiser For Bad Faith Trade Secrets ClaimsFifth Circuit Affirms Attorney’s Fee Award of $2.3 million in Misappropriation Case Against Former Employee who Failed to Comply with Court’s Objections Order
Trade Secret Misappropriation
Federal Circuit Upholds Setting Aside of Jury Verdict Where Trade Secrets Not Identified With Sufficient ParticularityFTC Signals Shift to Targeted Enforcement of Non-Competes in the Healthcare IndustryNinth Circuit Refuses to Apply California’s “Reasonable Particularity” Requirement to Claims Under the Defend Trade Secrets Act
Unfair competition
Evidence of a Defendant’s Physical or Digital Retention of Trade Secret Information Is Not Required to Prove Trade Secret Misappropriation Under the California Uniform Trade Secrets ActIllegal Deal? Ninth Circuit Rejects Attempt to Revive No-Poaching ClaimsTaboola the Latest Target of DOJ’s Aggressive Antitrust Scrutiny of Hiring Practices
UTSA
Reap What You Sow – Sixth Circuit Affirms Recovery of Research and Development Costs to Agricultural Company in Trade Secret CaseThe Developing “Avoided Costs” Remedy in Trade Secret LitigationInsufficient Evidence: Fifth Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction for Trade Secret Misappropriation